Michael Servetus - SIS
Michael Servetus Forums Information about the SIS Contact us Add to favorites Miguel Servet  
 
News and Events
Events Agenda
News About Servetus
Recent Books
All Michael Servetus
Biography
Writings
Resources
Image Gallery
Servetians
Downloads
About the Servetus International Society
Our History
Mission and Objectives
Constitution
Board of Trustees
Membership
Donations
Contact us
Our Services
Servetus Newsletter
Servetus Journal
Servetus Forum
Servetus Search
Servetus Web Mail
The Newsletter
Write the key and emaill
Subscribe to the Newsletter

Moderation, not Extremism: Monotheistic Perspective

3rd Regional Conference, August 29,2003
by Ambassador Syed Ahsani

Extremism in the form of communal strife, regional conflict and wars has been rampant on earth in all times-be it in Crusades, Inquisition, War of Roses, Thirty Year War, Tartar Invasion, and more recently, WW I and II; Korea, Vietnam; Arab- Israeli Wars; Rwanda; Congo; Bosnia; Kosovo; Persian Gulf War; Afghanistan and Iraq.

The Concert of Europe maintained equilibrium among European nations after Napoleon's defeat. It included former adversaries, as well as former allies. In time, the Concert broke up as newly democratic nations refused to cooperate with older monarchies. The break up of the Concert led, in part, to World War I.

Treaty of Versailles and the League of Nations followed the First World War. The harsh treaty terms stirred up unrest in Germany. Weak enforcement of the Treaty then allowed the unrest to turn into aggression. The League requirement for consensus in order to act made it unable to respond to member nation's aggression. The failure of these institutions led in part to the Second World War.

The United Nations, NATO and the Warsaw Pact defined the international system during the Cold War. During this time, the international system took on a bipolar character, which inadvertently suppressed more regional or nationalistic conflicts. The system has been effective in preventing violent global conflict.

The aftermath of the 11 September terrorist attacks dramatically highlighted the way in which state sovereignty has ceased to be a sacred principle of international relations. Compare US demands on Afghanistan with Austria-Hungary's demands on Serbia after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand on 28 June 1914 – the incident that sparked the First World War.In both cases, there was strong evidence that the terrorists had come from, or been trained in, the countries under threat. But Austria-Hungary had much better evidence of the involvement of elements of the Serbian Government in the plot than the US had in the case of the Taliban.

The Bosnian Serb conspirators were trained and armed by members of the Serbian intelligence forces, who aided them up to the point at which they crossed the border to carry out their criminal act. Austria-Hungary presented the evidence to Serbia, demanding that it bring those responsibleto justice and allow Austro-Hungarian monitors.

Despite the evidence of Serbian complicity, Austria-Hungary's ultimatum was condemned in the US, France, Russia and Britain as merely an excuse for going to war. "The most formidable demand ever imposed on one state by another," British Foreign Minister Sir Edward Grey called it. Austria-Hungary and its backer, Germany, have thus been seen by historians as bearing a large measure of guilt for the First World War.

The Bush administration's demands of the Taliban were as stringent as those in 1914, but were made without presenting any evidence to link Osama bin Laden to the attacks of 11 September. Yet the US demands, far from being condemned as a mere pretext for aggressive war, have been endorsed by a wide-ranging coalition of nations.

The idea that national sovereignty can extend to harboring terrorists builds on a notion unknown in 1914: that there are "crimes against humanity" which no-one, not even a sovereign government, may commit. Since terrorism indiscriminately kills innocent people, it is a crime against humanity. As we struggle now to envisage a world without terrorism, and to consider what are legitimate means of achieving this goal, we are broadening an earlier struggle to create a world without crimes like those committed in Nazi Germany, in Cambodia, in Bosnia, in Rwanda. What kind of institutions and structures would we need to bring such a world about?

The moral imperative of protecting the lives and well being of people does not depend upon national sovereignty, which has no intrinsic moral weight. What is paramount is respect for national sovereignty, avoiding extremism, paving the way for moderation, regional harmony and world peace.

Also, belief in religion proves that a faith-based civil society reflects charity, coexistence, forgiveness, freedom of faith, good neighborliness, moderation and tolerance, for instance, ethical Instructions are common between the Qur'an and the Gospel.

Quran lays down commandments about all spheres of human endeavor-be it spiritual or mundane; earthly existence or Hereafter The Messenger lived a life according to Quran and his Traditions form the second source of laws or Sharia.

The Torah contains laws regarding moral and physical conduct, the whole Gospel includes the instructive orders of Jesus Christ (A.S) that were compiled by the four writers of the Gospels (i.e. Matthew, Mark, Luke and John). Some examples:

Helping without Waiting to Requite and Alms Giving in Secret

The Quran:

  1. "And if ye give alms openly (even so) it is well, and if ye hide it and give it to the poor, it will be better still for yourselves; and (it) will remove from you some of your sins, and verily God is aware of all that ye do." (Al-Baqarah, 271)

  2. " O' ye who believe! Render not your charities worthless by obligation and injury (laid on them) like one who spendeth his wealth to be seen of men and believeth not in God and the last Day of Judgment. …" (Al-Baqarah, 264)

The Gospel:

  1. "Be careful not to perform your good works publicly to be noticed by the people; else you forfeit reward from your Father who is in the heaven. Thus, when you give charity, do not blow a trumpet ahead of you as the Hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets to gain glory from men.
    Sure you, they have reward. But when you practice charity, your left hand must not know what your right is doing, so that your charity will be in secret. And your God who sees in secret will reward you." (Matt. 6:1-5)

  2. "And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and at the street corners to be seen by the people ... When you fast, do not be sad-faced like the hypocrites, for they disfigure their faces to show others their fasting." (Matt. 6:16)

Fear of God; Rejection of Signs; Monotheism

The Quran:

  1. "Is he therefore better who hath laid his foundation on fear of God and (His) good-will, or he who layeth his foundation on the brink of a crumbling hollowed bank, so it crumbled down with him into the fire of Hell; and God guideth not people (who are) unjust. "(Al-Bara'at, 109)

  2. "Verily those who belie Our signs and in pride turn away from them, shall not open for them the gates of heaven nor shall they enter the Garden (of Paradise) until the camel passeth through the eye of the needle; thus do We recompense the guilty." (Al-A'raf, 40)

  3. "O' ye people! A parable is set forth (unto you) so listen ye unto it! Verily, those whom ye call upon besides God can never create (even) a fly, even though they all gather (themselves) together for it." (Al-Hajj, 73)

The Gospel:

  1. "Everyone, then, who listens to these sayings of Mine and puts them into practice will be like a thoughtful man who built his house on the rock. The rains came down, the floods rose, the winds blew and beat upon that house, but it never collapsed, for it was based on the rock. And every one who hears these sayings of Mine and fails to practice them will be like a foolish man who built his house on the sand. The rains came down, the floods rose, the winds blew and beat upon that house and it collapsed. And the wreck of it was complete." (Matt. 7:24-27)

  2. "... I say to you again, it is easier for a camel to pass through a needle's eye than for a wealthy person to enter the kingdom of God." (Matt. 19:24)

  3. "... For all creatures united together could not create a single new fly from nothing, and this it is to create." (Barnabas 63:14)

More than any other land, America symbolizes the best of these virtues. Given this noble legacy of Pilgrim Fathers, U.S has the potential to become a moral superpower, a beacon of light for civil liberties, economic development,
tolerance, and peace at home and abroad.

In this perspective, the coming 3rd Regional Conference by the Association of Muslim Social Scientists on August 23 in UT Arlington at Blue Bonnet Hall assumes topical importance.

The first conference was on Muslim Contribution to Civilization in Midway Church, Dallas, the second at Dallas Central Mosque, Richardson, on Role of Religion in Promoting World Peace. For further information, contact Dr.Basheer Ahmed: 817-572-4981;E-mail: mbahmed05@yahoo.com;or Syed Ahsani: 817-572-0648; Email: AAhsa4@aol.com

 

Return Print page  

Forum

Home | About the SIS | Our Services | News and Events | Michael Servetus | Web map | Contact us
© 2003-2004 Servetus.org, Servetus International Society. All Michael Servetus | Legal Notice